Radiometric dating of rocks and minerals using naturally occurring, long-lived radioactive isotopes is troublesome for young-earth creationists because the techniques have provided overwhelming evidence of the antiquity of the earth and life. Some so-called creation scientists have attempted to show that radiometric dating does not work on theoretical grounds for example, Arndts and Overn ; Gill but such attempts invariably have fatal flaws see Dalrymple ; York and Dalrymple Other creationists have focused on instances in which radiometric dating seems to yield incorrect results. In most instances, these efforts are flawed because the authors have misunderstood or misrepresented the data they attempt to analyze for example, Woodmorappe ; Morris HM ; Morris JD
Compare and contrast relative age dating with radiometric age dating 9 compare to correlate rock or go to correlate rock layers.
The difference dating is the technique in the Geology dating which the age is determined with relation to the other objects. In other words, we can say that in relative dating the archaeologist determines that which of the two fossil or the artifacts are older. Contrary to this, the absolute dating is relative technique, using which the exact age of the artifacts, fossils, or absolute are ascertained.
2019 © ndri.info. All Rigths Reserved. All models were 0ver 18 y.o.